Subscribe to Posts with RSS
The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective @LegalTech
The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective – 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm in Concourse E
The case for using machine coding and classification of documents in the eDiscovery review process has never been stronger. As costs and ESI volumes continue to grow, machine coding promises faster, cheaper – and better. Yet there remain many concerns about how to properly use these technologies, and the potential for risk when used incorrectly. Hear what a prominent member of the Judiciary and members of the Bar have to say about the promising future – and their concerns for reaching it.
Speakers:
Honorable Andrew J. Peck
Ed Larkin, Esq., Partner, Venable LLP
James D. Shook, Esq., Director of Compliance and eDiscovery team EMC
RSVP and reserve your session seat @ EMC’s LegalTech Sessions
Posted By: David in eDiscovery on January 24th, 2012.
Tags: #LTNY, Charlie Kaupp, Dan Brassil, Digital Strata, Director of Compliance and eDiscovery team EMC, Don C. McLaughlin, Early Case Assessment, Ed Larkin, emc, ESQ., Falcon Discovery, H5, Harnessing Search Technology Effectively, Honorable Andrew J. Peck, James D. Shook, Jr, Kazeon, Kenneth Rashbaum, legaltech, LegalTech New York 2012, Partner, Rashbaum Associates LLC, SourceOne, The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective, Venable LLP
Pingback from The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective – Electronic Discovery – ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY – E-Discovery Blog and Law Guides
Time January 24, 2012 at 12:42
[...] Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective Source: original article Author: David Categories: Electronic discovery, e-discovery, [...]