Main menu:



Site search

Recent Comments

  • Jim: on “Weekend At Bernie’s” and End-user based eDiscovery
    VeepGeek -- Thank you for the feedback. I agree that forens...
  • VeepGeek: on “Weekend At Bernie’s” and End-user based eDiscovery
    Excellent article! The only item I would like to have seen ...
  • Dave Swider: on The Future eDiscovery Arms Race: It is all about the Semantics
    Interesting analysis. I'm hopeful that we'll eventually hav...
  • Carlos J. Alarcon: on An eDiscovery Case For ROI: The Five Steps
    We have worked on Information Risk for more than eight years...
  • pensions Birmingham: on The Pension Committee Blog Series: Implications and Questions
    The ediscovery refers to discovery in civil litigation which...

Archives

Blogroll

SourceOne eDiscovery - Kazeon Authors

Metadata Is Closer Than It Appears

By James D. Shook, Esq.

James D. Shook, Esq., EMC eDiscovery Expert

James D. Shook, Esq., EMC eDiscovery expert

Published in DIGITAL DISCOVERY & E-EVIDENCE

Among lawyers, the word metadata is likely to conjure confusion, looks of disbelief, fear and–in rarer cases–a knowing smile. Metadata issues present some of the more vexing technical issues for litigation and e-discovery personnel. With metadata back squarely in the news from Judge Scheindlin’s opinion in National Day Laborer Organizing Network v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, 10 Civ. 3488, (S.D.N.Y., 2/3/11), which held that certain metadata must be included in productions under the Freedom of Information Act, it seems like a good time to revisit the issues.

Read the Full Article: Metadata is Closer Than It Appears

Write a comment